If you google, “Retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard,” you will get 386,000 references. I would caution however that none of them are in any way mainstream and you will not see this story reported in your newspapers or on TV news either I suspect.
The question is then, is this just bullshit or is there possibly something to it? You see Malcom Howard made a deathbed confession when he, (apparently), came clean and admitted that the CIA blew up Building 7 of the World Trade Centre that fateful day in 2001. The report is dated July 18th 2017.
“Mr. Howard, who worked for the CIA for 36 years as an
operative, claims he was tapped by senior CIA agents to work on the project due to his engineering background, and early career in the demolition business.” according to this report.
For those who don’t know or just forgot, Building 7 was not hit by an aircraft, didn’t come down until after 5.00pm (LT) that afternoon though the BBC reported it as having fallen a good twenty minutes before it did so. In an interview after the event, the new owner of the World Trade Centre, Larry Silverstein explained that he’d had a chat with the authorities in New York that afternoon and according to Larry, “We said that there had been so much death already that day that the best thing we could do is just ‘pull it’ so they went ahead and pulled it.”
Now ‘PULL IT” is a term used in professional demolition and refers to the detonation of previously placed explosives at strategic positions in a building, usually to take out the load bearing supports. Malcom then fills us in when he says, “It was a classic controlled demolition with explosives. We used super-fine military grade nano-thermite composite materials as explosives. The hard part was getting thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms into the building without causing too much concern. But almost every single office in the Building 7 was rented by the CIA, the Secret Service, or the military, which made it easier.”
So Malcom and his colleagues had done their job. He said that, “When the building came down, it was such a rush. Everything went exactly to plan. It was so smooth. Everybody was evacuated. Nobody was hurt in WTC 7.” But in the days afterwards as he and his mates watched endless re-runs of the day’s events on television, they began to worry, he says. “There were so many loose ends, so much evidence left behind. We thought the public would be all over it. We thought there would be a public uprising that the media couldn’t ignore. They’d be funding investigations and demanding to know why they were being lied to. We thought they’d find chemical composites in the area that would prove Building 7 was blown up. We thought there would be a revolution. It would go all the way to the top, to President Bush. He’d be dragged out of the White House.”
But he says his job was on Building 7 only and explains that even if the CIA brought down buildings One & Two, he wouldn’t necessarily know about it because they operated a cell system of teams. In a recent article entitled, “This just won’t go away,” I covered Buildings 1 & 2 and indeed Buildings 3, 4, 5, & 6. The only conclusion I could draw was that while we don’t know exactly what happened that day, we do definitely know what didn’t happen. What didn’t happen was the official account of the events as reported by NIST. Now this guy has broken ranks and spilled the beans on one of the events. As regards NIST he says that, “There could never be a real investigation. The entire shadow government, as you call them now, are implicated.” The 79-year-old, spending his final weeks at home, said he doesn’t expect to be taken into custody following his confession because “then they’d have to go after everyone else. They will just use the media to attack me. They are all on the payroll to suppress everything around 9/11.” That is why your mainstream news will not tell you anything about this.
I have heard other commentators remark that if 9/11 was a home-grown operation then it was big, complicated, required top class professionals and lots of them and the timing and co-ordination had to be nearly perfect to fit the story that was going to be told in its aftermath. As Mr. Howard said, The World Trade Center 7 operation is unique among his demolitions, as it is the only demolition that, “We had to pretend wasn’t a demolition job”. There have been other whistle-blowers on the fringes of 9/11 but this is the first one we’ve seen who claims to have played an active role. He’s 79 now so he was 63 back then and he’s kept quiet until now even though he freely admits to having been uneasy about the whole operation. He’s only opening up now because he’s dying anyway so there’s nothing they can do to him.
One wonders then will there be others who partook and are now cruising into old age, who may also come out and confess about the events of that day. If so, and it’s a big if, the 9/11 story will gather a head of steam, which will demand the true story be told.
I did say this just won’t go away.